Hello, Carsten Dominik wrote: >> I agree, but couldn't think of any other way. There are 3 other >> unicode options: >> >> 1. A box with an X (☒ U+2612 BALLOT BOX WITH X) >> 2. A bare (unboxed) X (✗ U+2717 BALLOT X) >> 3 A bare checkmark (✓ U+2713 CHECK MARK) >> >> I also found this character: >> >> U+237B ⍻ not check mark >> >> If you think one of those would work we could use it instead. > > No, I don't think any of them does it.
>From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Checkbox: ╭──── Tri-state checkbox │ │ Some applications use checkboxes that allow an indeterminate state in │ addition to the two provided by a normal checkbox. This third state is │ shown as a square or dash in the checkbox, and indicates that its state │ is neither checked nor unchecked. This is most often used when the │ checkbox is tied to a collection of items in mixed states. ╰──── Something like [-] could be nice, then, as corresponds to the Org look and feel. Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban
