Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: > Now, synchronization happens lazily, which means the cache is only > updated when and where needed, or during idle time. Therefore the cache > mechanism scales a lot better.
This seems to be an awesome news ! I can hardly believe you manage to find the time to do this. I'm sorry that this is only a "thank you" message (vs, e.g., actual work from me in the directions you suggest), it certainly deserves more than that, but I'd find it sad if it had no answer at all. -- Nico.
