Hi Aaron,

Aaron Ecay <aarone...@gmail.com> writes:

> How does this sound as an algorithm:
> 1. if :file is present, behave exactly as we do now
> 2. if :file is absent but :file-ext and a #+name is present, generate a
>    :file parameter from :output-dir, the #+name, and :file-ext.

I suggest this one:

1. if :file is present, behave exactly as we do now

2. if :file-ext is present:

   - if #+name is present, generate a :file parameter
     from :output-dir, #+name and :file-ext

   - otherwise, generate the :file parameter from
     :output-dir, the headline or the title or the
     current file name and :file-ext

Just falling back on something sensible when :file is absent
and :file-ext is specified.
   
> Open questions:
> 1. should :file-ext without a #+name be a no-op, or an error?

See above.

> 2. should :output-dir apply to the :file case as well?

To me yes.

In overall I think would be good, but I'd like Eric and other
babelist around here to have a look before we commit this.
So perhaps another round of patch testing will be good.

Thanks!

-- 
 Bastien

Reply via email to