Hi Bastien On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Bastien <b...@gnu.org> wrote: > Yes. There is also `thing-at-point' which does not recognize 1.1 as a > number... I circumvented this by using `calc-eval'. The above should > now work correctly.
Yes it does. Using Calc is a nice solution, thank you. I did not notice before but the first commit 7ac468ff5547891503b6b8f5fa03793d79b3bff6 changed SHIFT-RET on the empty field | 2 | | 5 | | | to add a new row instead of only replacing the current field. Michael