Hi Alex, Alex Kosorukoff <a...@3form.com> writes:
> Excluding mark-active will work, the result will be the same as after > my patch, except performance will not be the same. Excluding variable > requires filtering the list of variables which takes O(n) whereas my > patch takes O(1). Mark-active is nil before > org-capture-steal-local-variables because this is a new buffer. It > seems in this case setting it back to nil is faster than trying to > preserve its original value nil. I see what you mean but there is no performance issue here and not copying the value of mark-active is cleaner than setting it back to nil -- we never want to copy the value of the mark at all. -- Bastien
