Bastien <b...@gnu.org> writes: > Hi Eric, > > Eric Abrahamsen <e...@ericabrahamsen.net> writes: > >> For some reason I've been sorting lots of TODOs recently, and found the >> default behavior of org-sort-entries a little odd. It sorts according to >> the order found in org-todo-keywords-1, which apparently just comes from >> the order the keywords were scanned during setup. I don't think that's >> all that useful, so the attached patch sorts first by >> org-not-done-keywords vs org-done-keywords, then alphabetically. >> Headings with no keywords sort "big". > > I don't think the alphabetical order is very useful here, and putting > headlines without TODO keywords first when sorting by TODO order is > counter-intuitive at least. > > Let me suggest the attached patch instead: it puts TODO entries, then > entries without a TODO keyword, then DONE entries. > > Would it be an improvement?
Sure! The actual ordering of stuff was an arbitrary choice on my part -- the only thing I cared about was getting done and not-done separated. This looks like a tidier solution, to boot... E
