The former, and you explained something that I didn't even know that I should have known, too.
Thanks! Grant Rettke | ACM, ASA, FSF, IEEE, SIAM g...@wisdomandwonder.com | http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/ “Wisdom begins in wonder.” --Socrates ((λ (x) (x x)) (λ (x) (x x))) “Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop taking it seriously.” --Thompson On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Matt Lundin <m...@imapmail.org> wrote: > Grant Rettke <g...@wisdomandwonder.com> writes: > >>> What I was aiming for was to have in-line footnotes that did have >>> randomly generated IDs so that I one still may reference them. > >> Here is what I had intended: >> >> (setq org-footnote-define-inline +1) >> (setq org-footnote-auto-label 'random) >> (setq org-footnote-auto-adjust nil) > > Nice! I misunderstood the initial question. The above works fine for me > as a way to insert inline footnotes with random labels. When I call > org-footnote-action, I get the following. > > - Here is a footnote.[fn:5952d54e: A footnote] > >>> I misunderstood though, because the footnotes will still get defined >>> in the Footnote section, too. > > Could you please explain what you mean here? The above settings do not > create a footnote section when I call org-footnote-action or > org-footnote-new. But you could use (setq org-footnote-section nil) to > ensure that any footnote definitions (if they exist) will be placed in > the same section as the footnote reference. > > Or do you mean the label for "Footnotes" in, say, html export? If so, I > believe you can configure the variable org-html-footnotes-section. > > Best, > Matt
