Hello,
Achim Gratz <[email protected]> writes:
> Yes. But looking at the original regex has me wondering if the need for
> the extra '[' isn't an indication of something more fundamentally wrong
> with it.
[^ \f\t\n\r\v] is wrong as character set allowed for languages should be
much more limited than that. I discussed it with Eric some months ago.
> Where does that need to have unused groups and groups that match the
> empty string come from?
This is probably to prevent matching
thisisasrc_emacs-list{}
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
