Hi Bastien, > Sebastien Vauban writes: >> As I do suffer from the same problem, and do not take the time to >> archive all DONE subtrees, I think that an alternative approach would >> be that DONE subtrees wouldn't be expanded (by default) in the S-TAB >> cycles. >> >> Does that sound reasonable? > > Not to me, as there would be no real difference between DONE and > ARCHIVED tasks then.
You're of course right. Though, without archiving manually the DONE items, the current view is confusing, see http://screencast.com/t/AdVMyOJge32Z. It'd be good that the `org-headline-done' face would be propagated to the DONE subtrees, and not only to the main headline. That would improve a lot the readability of Org tasks lists. Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban
