El Wed, 06 Aug 2014 14:12:21 +0200 Nicolas Goaziou va escriure: > > I understand that "paragraph is alone in its item" is not a good test to > skip paragraph wrappers. I'm still confused about what a good test would > be. In particular, what should be done in the following cases > > - item > - item > - sublist > resuming item >
You mean „item“ contains text+ol+p? Rather strange… I first thought that „resuming item“ would be a continuation line of „sublist“ (that is, as if „sublist resuming item“ were the only item of the sublist). But why not, as a general rule, avoid <p> for the first elements of lists? That is, don't output paragraph+list+paragraph, but text+list+paragraph. This works for the simple case (<li>text</li>) and allows the complex ones (<li>text<p>aa</p><ol></ol><whatever></whatever></li>). > i.e., (paragraph plain-list paragraph), and > > - outer > > another paragraph > > - inner > - simple list > > i.e., are nested plain-lists independent relatively to paragraph > wrappers skipping. I think so, but I'd rather make sure. > I'd also say text+p+ol. Rather unusual syntax anyway… but it shouldn't break the simple <li>Plain item</li> (now broken).
