Aaron Ecay <aarone...@gmail.com> writes: >>> Merging the functions might only be worth doing if there were any more >>> places where \captionof needed to be used. >> >> That's the intent, yes. It would be a waste not to use a package now >> residing in the default list. Among the transcoders where >> `org-latex--wrap-label' is used, some could probably benefit from >> a non-float caption, if requested by the user. > > OK. I’ll think about this. One question is what type of caption this > should be. (i.e. \captionof{what?}{the caption}). Using the catch-all > figure caption type seems most sensible to me, but feedback from other > latex users is welcome.
One goal that should be archivable is to get rid of the (horrible) float package in org-latex-default-packages-alist¹ . In other words (I'm guessing here), reinterpret [H] placement instructions and do it the "capt-of" way. —Rasmus Footnotes: ¹ float rewrites the float mechanism which can cause trouble. I personally never use it. -- Enough with the bla bla!