Aaron Ecay <[email protected]> writes:
>>> Merging the functions might only be worth doing if there were any more
>>> places where \captionof needed to be used.
>>
>> That's the intent, yes. It would be a waste not to use a package now
>> residing in the default list. Among the transcoders where
>> `org-latex--wrap-label' is used, some could probably benefit from
>> a non-float caption, if requested by the user.
>
> OK. I’ll think about this. One question is what type of caption this
> should be. (i.e. \captionof{what?}{the caption}). Using the catch-all
> figure caption type seems most sensible to me, but feedback from other
> latex users is welcome.
One goal that should be archivable is to get rid of the (horrible)
float package in org-latex-default-packages-alist¹ . In other words
(I'm guessing here), reinterpret [H] placement instructions and do it
the "capt-of" way.
—Rasmus
Footnotes:
¹ float rewrites the float mechanism which can cause trouble. I
personally never use it.
--
Enough with the bla bla!
