Grant Rettke <g...@wisdomandwonder.com> writes: >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Nick Dokos <ndo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Grant Rettke <g...@wisdomandwonder.com> writes: >>> Yikes what a week sorry about that here is what you would need I shall >>> be defining a function to provide all such details in the future and >>> thanks Nick for addressing: >>> >>> ╭──── >>> │ (setq org-babel-noweb-wrap-start "«") >>> │ (setq org-babel-noweb-wrap-end "»") >>> ╰──── >>> >>> >> >> And an OT question: >> >> Since on my keyboard I can type << much more easily than I can type « > > Totally agreed, I'm using a US QWERTY keyboard. > >> I was wondering: does your keyboard provide an easy way to type a >> guillemet? > > No but I use the [key-chord] package to do so like this: > > ╭──── > │ (key-chord-define-global "<<" (lambda () (interactive) (insert "«"))) > │ (key-chord-define-global ">>" (lambda () (interactive) (insert "»"))) > ╰──── > > It is the same amount of typing but you get the desired character. > >> Is that why you changed it? Or is it purely aesthetics? > > Aesthetic personal preferences. After the fact, this preference has > proven to be valuable for non-org-users, though. > > When I use `org' at work and show literate documents to non-users, the > guillemet makes it crystal clear that the text is somehow special, and > not just "something enclosed by two less-than and greater-than > symbols". Not totally sure why people react this way, but they do. > > > [key-chord] > https://github.com/emacsmirror/key-chord/blob/master/key-chord.el
Ok - thanks! -- Nick
