On 2014-11-03, at 09:28, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Marcin Borkowski <mb...@wmi.amu.edu.pl> writes: > >> just wondering: on one hand, we have lines like >> >> #+OPTIONS: toc:nil > > This is a keyword. > >> On the other hand, we have >> >> #+ATTR_ASCII: :width 10 > > This is an attribute. > >> Why is the syntax (seemingly, at least) inconsistent? Why not >> `width:10' or `:toc nil'? > > These are two different things, so there is no real reason to make them > look like each other. Also, and more importantly, moving OPTIONS to the > other syntax is, IMO, unreadable: > > #+OPTIONS: :| t :^ nil :* t :\n t > > Note there is also another syntax type, e.g.,: > > #+TOC: headlines 2
Thanks for your clarifications! Things seem still a bit hazy for me, but I guess I'll have to live with it:-). > Regards, Best, -- Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Adam Mickiewicz University
