On Thursday, 13 Nov 2014 at 09:26, Samuel Loury wrote: [...]
> I like the idea of `org-clone-subtree-with-time-shift', but wouldn't it > make the parsing of the files slower? Maybe but O(n)... I doubt it would make much difference in practice compared with parsing a complex date structure. > I admit that in the example, this would not have a big impact since > there would be only 9 entries. Nevertheless, I wonder if this can be > considered as a general solution. It's a solution that works well for the reasons given by others. I use it for all of my lectures and it turns out better than a single repeat directive would because you can annotate each instance separately, not to mention being able to easily remove lectures that might be cancelled or change ones that may have a different location or time. Etc. > In my org files that sum up to 51425 lines (not taking into account the > archives), the creation of the agendas takes minutes to generate. There Minutes! What version of org and what kind of system? I have >35k lines in my org agenda files and generating an agenda on a 5 year old system takes seconds. On my wee Pandora, it takes a minute or so but this is a very slow system with slow SD cards... -- : Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 24.4.50.1, Org release_8.3beta-558-g83d8a2