Hello,

Marcin Borkowski <mb...@wmi.amu.edu.pl> writes:

> for some reason I want to have a TODO item that /cannot/ be (directly,
> by C-c C-t) made into a "done" state.  It seems that
>
> #+SEQ_TODO: TODO |
>
> works.  Is that legal?

It may seem to work, but you are probably going to run into subtle
problems. The TODO/DONE code expects both a TODO and a DONE states.

Reconsider your reason!


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou

Reply via email to