Hello, Marcin Borkowski <mb...@wmi.amu.edu.pl> writes:
> for some reason I want to have a TODO item that /cannot/ be (directly, > by C-c C-t) made into a "done" state. It seems that > > #+SEQ_TODO: TODO | > > works. Is that legal? It may seem to work, but you are probably going to run into subtle problems. The TODO/DONE code expects both a TODO and a DONE states. Reconsider your reason! Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou