Jon Snader <jsna...@mac.com> writes: > As I see it, we’ve reached the conclusion that we should either have > some sort of minimal table-driven mechanism or duplicate the > functionality in org-sort-list. I like duplicating the org-sort-list > functionality best. As you pointed out before, org-do-sort is an > internal function and we probably shouldn’t let users mess with it. We > could, I suppose, move all the work out to org-table-sort-lines but > then org-do-sort is little more than a call to sort.
You can move `org-do-sort' into "org-table.el" with an "org-table--" prefix, if you want to. > As I said above, you’ve convinced me that ?f ?F is the right solution. Fair enough. Let's settle on that, then. Thanks. Regards,
