Hello, Marcin Borkowski <mb...@wmi.amu.edu.pl> writes:
> I'm studying org-block-regexp. One thing that bugs me is this part: > > #\\+begin_? > > It suggests to me that the underscore after "begin" might be optional; > but a quick experiment with the exporter shows that this is not the > case. This is the case for dynamic blocks (info "(org) Dynamic blocks") > Next, this part: > > \\([^ \n]+\\) > > would suggest that TAB is a valid part of the name of the block. > Strange, isn't it? It is. "\\(\\S-+\\)" would be more appropriate I think (this is also what is used in "org-element.el"). > Finally, the rationale behind > > \\(\\([^\n]+\\)\\)? > > escapes me completely. What's the use of groups nested like this? This looks like a plain bug, a minor one, tho. Before fixing it, Someone has to make sure it doesn't break matching groups somewhere. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
