On 2015-02-24 at 07:53, Nicolas Richard
<theonewiththeevill...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
They cannot contain link, nor anything else. However, the
feature you describe above was deemed useful enough that
`org-open-at-point' sloppily opens anything looking like a link
(or a timestamp) within a comment.
However, there is, per syntax, no link there, and I don't think
it should be fontified.
AUCTeX has a variable named `LaTeX-syntactic-comments' : ,---- |
User option: If non-nil comments will be handled according to
LaTeX | syntax. `---- In AUCTeX, it is mainly
about filling and indentation, but in Org it could mean "let the
usual (interactive) commands pretend we're not in a comment". If
Org is to adopt such a variable, it could fontify according to
what the interactive commands will do.
Would that be acceptable ? It could be made a minor mode.
It would certainly be acceptable to me...
-k.
