Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> writes:

> Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
>> Do you think that you /always/ want "pdfkeywords" to hold exactly the
>> same contents as what you could put in your document?
> You as in me: yes most certainly.

IIUC, it contradicts your initial post where you wanted, at some later
time, to add bells and whistles to keywords displayed in the output
(e.g., turning them into links).

I'm not very keen on the idea of KEYWORD doing two different things. If
that's not the case, I'm fine with it.

>> Do you think that a user who wants to fill pdfkeywords will always want
>> to also add these contents in the body of the document?
> Which is why the patch provided a switch in #+OPTIONS.

The switch is all or nothing. Again, you're talking about two different
features : keywords in meta-data and keywords in data.


Reply via email to