2015-03-26 21:27 GMT+01:00 Nick Dokos <[email protected]>:
> Cecil Westerhof <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > I was asked to make a diagram and was thinking that dot in org-mode
> could be a good idea.
> >
> > I got reasonably fast the following:
> > <snip
> > This is a good deal in the right direction, but a few things should be
> different:
> > - E should be left of F
> > - resource should go to the second 'line' without losing its border
> > - K should be a 'line' lower
> >
>
> Maybe this will help although it's not a complete implementation of
> what you have. The idea is to define rows and arrange your nodes into
> those rows by using rank=same. Then make the row nodes and edges
> invisible. It's also important to do the sequencing correctly, e.g.
> in your example, if you just switch F -- E to E -- F, E will be to the
> left of F as you want. But I don't know how to get the resources
> subgraph to be treated as a node and thereby place it on the same row as F.
>
> In any case, here's the current trial balloon:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> #+BEGIN_SRC dot :file test2.svg :cmdline -Kdot -Tsvg
> graph foo {
> row1--row2--row3--row4 [style="invisible"];
> row1, row2, row3, row4 [style="invisible"];
>
> utilities [label = "Utilities"]
> A
> B
> C
> D
> E
> F [shape="rectangle"]
> G
> H
> I
> K
> subgraph cluster_ta {
> color=blue
> {rank = same; L, M;}
> L
> M
> }
>
> {rank=same; row1 utilities A B C; }
> {rank=same; row2 D E F;}
> {rank=same; row3 G H I;}
> {rank=same; row4 K;}
>
> subgraph cluster_resources {
> resources [label = "Resources"]
> graph[color=red];
> }
>
> A -- F
> B -- F
> C -- F
> A -- D
> E -- F
> F -- G
> F -- H
> F -- I
> F -- K
> K -- L
> K -- M
> L -- M
> }
> #+END_SRC
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
I did it a little differently:
#+BEGIN_SRC dot :file test.png :cmdline -Kdot -Tpng
graph {
utilities [label = "Utility's"]
A
B
C
D
E
F [shape = rectangle]
subgraph cluster_resources {
color=blue
resources [label = "Resources"]
}
G
G_ [style="invisible"]
H
I
K
subgraph cluster_ta {
color=blue
{rank = same; L, M}
L
M
}
{rank = same; D, E, F}
{rank = same; G_, K}
A -- F
B -- F
C -- F
A -- D
E -- F
F -- K
F -- G
F -- H
F -- I
G -- G_ [style="invisible"]
K -- L
K -- M
L -- M
}
#+END_SRC
In this way I do not get an empty column. It would be better when K would
put between and below H and I, but I think I can live with it.
--
Cecil Westerhof