Hi, William Henney <when...@gmail.com> writes:
>> >>> http://www.adobe.com/accessibility/products.html >> >>> is a good place to start. >> >> >> >> It's a list of a bunch of software packages of which most are not (i) >> free >> >> in any meaning of the word; and (ii) supported on GNU/Linux. >> > >> > So what? IIUC, the OP wants to have something similar using Emacs and >> > (maybe) free (in a usual sense, or in FSF sense) software. Isn't it >> > a valid request? >> >> Of course it is, but OP is referring to features of some software that I >> don't have access to, so how am I supposed to make sense of it? I'm not >> going to (i) install a new OS; and (ii) buy/torrent software to understand >> and test a feature in named software. >> >> If there's a standard I'm eager to hear about it. >> >> > I believe the relevant standard is PDF/UA > > http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=PDF/UA > > As far as I can tell, support for this from LaTeX is still very much a work > in progress, but there is an accessibility.sty package that has made a > start. Here is a recent SO discussion: > > http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/124291/revisiting-producing-structured-pdfs-from-latex Thanks those are interesting reads. Based on the SO question it seems that the best way to go about this ATM is either adding "\pdfinterwordspaceon", meta-accessibility, and cmap packages to the preamble via #+LATEX_HEADER or org-latex-packages or use Context. Org does not have a Context backend. The (meta-)accessibility package does not seem to be on CTAN. I don't think Org can do more to get 'tagged pdfs' via ox-latex until better LaTeX solutions exist or until ox-context.el exists. When exporting a pdf via Libreoffice there's an option for tagged pdf (via File → Export as PDF → General). Is that a suitable solution in this case? Thanks, Rasmus -- Send from my Emacs
