Daniel Clemente <n142...@gmail.com> writes: > While the two systems work, I don't see either why the #orgheadline129 > system is better than the #sec-1-4-3-1-2.
Actually is is better because it is consistent. "sec-1-4-3-1-2" is almost as fragile and doesn't play nice with unnumbered headlines. However, this is not the reason why this change was introduced. I explained it already. > Not important enough to justify a breaking change either. This is not really a breaking change. AFAIK, "sec-x.x.x" labelling was never made public. However, you can use CUSTOM_ID to enforce some label and then refer to it. > IDs are not only internal. CSS knows about it, JS too, and URLs can be > built and shared through the web that include org IDs > (myweb.com/somedoc.html#someid). ID not specified by the user are internal. "sec-x-x" is an internal scheme. You can still use CUSTOM_ID for that. Of course, it is also possible to add an anchor with id "sec-x-x" to numbered headlines only (maybe as an opt-in so newcomers can at least read about it). However, I suspect that a filter can do as well. Regards,
