Hi Achim, Achim Gratz <strom...@nexgo.de> writes:
> Since it already > has happened and the general consensus seems to be that we should go > there eventually, just maybe not right now, I don't see why we suddenly > also need to re-define what master is about. The redefinition already happened (i.e. the master branch is about Org+Emacs 24.3+) and it happened before we could reach a consensus about it, or simply take the time to really discuss it as we need. I'm trying to find the best conditions to move forward here. If the repository is in a state that pushes us toward one decision, these are not the best conditions IMO. So if we revert the changes, that's fine. If not, that's fine too, but we will have to decide things as if the commits where not done. -- Bastien
