Sebastien Vauban <sva-n...@mygooglest.com> writes: > William Denton <w...@pobox.com> writes: >> I'm trying to spend more time in a sparse tree view where I just see >> TODOs (C-c / t). I didn't like having the TODOs at different levels >> of indentation, though. I prefer seeing them all lined up, so I moved >> them all to be fourth-level headline. It's visually pleasing, and >> I don't care if a second-level headline has a fourth-level child >> without a third-level one. >> >> Do other people do this? > > No, and I don't think that's sane. It would be logical to expect > problems at export time (to LaTeX, among others) and in Org-lint. > > I try to put all the tasks at the 2nd level, the 1st level being > reserved for big sections such as "Administration", "Tasks", "Team", > etc. > > I'm very rigorous about expecting that all my "project management" > documents can be exported (without loosing subtrees or generating error) > to HTML (as the very first goal) and to LaTeX (as the second one). > > OTOH, I don't deny your wish to get things aligned; that's why I've > opted to 4-char todo states only! > > Best regards, > Seb
4-char todo states? How about a list? I can't picture how to abbreviate some things... Dave
