>> This doesn't look like the right fix.
>> Normally, the caller would instead use `STRING_SET_UNIBYTE' after the call
>> (or rather calls one of make_foo_string which does it for him) if needed.

> You are right, the problem is finding where this should be done :-)

Well, maybe we can help, if you tell us what you know, ;-)


        Stefan


_______________________________________________
Emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug

Reply via email to