Kenichi Handa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sorry, I don't remember what discussion we had and which > code I showed you.
For what it's worth, I think you suggested the quail-completion code as the basis of the `normal' completion of the quail sequences that I wanted. I don't remember if it looked too complicated at the time or whether I didn't get round to it. _______________________________________________ Emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
