Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In what xterm did you test these? I remember vaguely that I tried in
> > the past to add more bindings to xterm.el, but abandoned the idea
> > after I discovered that different flavors of Unix had xterm's that
> > used incompatible bindings.
>
> Luckily, tho the bindings are sometimes different, they rarely conflict.
> So I think it's better to just add those bindings and to then remove them if
> we bump into a conflict. Also note that the bindings in xterm.el have lower
> precedence than the ones in the user's .emacs and the ones setup from the
> terminfo database.
So should I take this as an approval?
A possible explanation for the different strings for f1-f4:
the xterm docs seem to say that the "old style xterm" (which is
enabled by compiling with --disable-vt52 or by setting the
oldXtermFKeys resource) emits \e1[1-4]* for the f1-f4 keys. By
default xterm emits the \eO*[P-S] strings for f1-f4.
--dan
_______________________________________________
Emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
