Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think this boils down to a bug in the kernel headers that gentoo > provides. Here is the thread and how I think it got included: > > http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/1/message/61720/thread > > Are you saying that most GNU/Linux distributions don't have this > problem--only Gentoo?
I can't really speak for other distributions, but if each distribution (according to Kyle Moffett) has to provide their own version of "cleaned [kernel] headers", then I would guess that a lot of distributions don't do a very good job of cleaning them. Who knows how many macros from the kernel headers interfere with other programs. > If so, we could just decide it is their fault. However, if adding > > #ifdef noinclude > #undef noinclude > #endif > > to xterm.c at the right place works around the problem, we may as > well do so. I think that would be a good idea. Maybe you or someone else could put it right above the definition of NO_INLINE with a small comment. _______________________________________________ Emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
