Can I get a reply to this, please? I don't want to assume that you're not
doing this and then find out that it is in fact done.
Thanks.
Any news on this? Will you be allowing different debugger quit
behaviors? Will you, for example, use a user option (funcall
'debugger-quit-function) in place of (bury-buffer)? I would
prefer `quit-window' for such a function and you would prefer
`bury-buffer' - a user option would satisfy everyone.
Please let me know, so I'll know whether or not to do this in
my local code.
Thanks.
From: Drew Adams
OK. Are you saying that it will remain as is (iconifies on
exit), or will you try to somehow allow for different
behaviors: iconify, delete frame, leave frame displayed?
If this is the way it will be, then I'll adapt locally; if you
will change things, then I'll wait - I just want to know.
From: Drew Adams
> provide some way for users to get a different behavior
> from `q' and `c' at top level, besides iconifying?
_______________________________________________
Emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
