Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Cc: [email protected] > > From: Dan Nicolaescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 08:25:15 -0700 > > > I'm still not sure what are you saying. Where do you suggest to move > those top-level forms, and what would be the mechanism to evaluate > them?
All the top level forms in each term/TERMINALNAME.el file will be moved inside a newly created function TERMINALNAME-initialize-terminal. > I mean, I understand the principles and don't need to be convinced in > their usefulness, I just want to understand what are your specific > suggestions. > > A test for an autoloaded function being fboundp will always yield t, > so I think it's useless to check fboundp as an instrument of > distinguishing between terminal types. And yet you did use fboundp in > your original message. I think Stefan's answer should shed a light on this. If not, I can try again to explain better. _______________________________________________ Emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
