If we do that, we might as well delete lazy-lock.el and fast-lock.el
rather than leave them in obsolete.
We don't normally delete packages that are obsolete, we normally put
them in the `obsolete' directory. Is there a reason to treat these
differently?
We could delete all the obsolete files, I guess. Would that be
better? I tend to think that having them available as examples
could be useful for someone--and it does no harm.
To make SURE it does no harm, I will turn off compilation and other
such processing of the `obsolete' subdir.
_______________________________________________
Emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
