"Richard M. Stallman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So in my mind, DTWW is not an alternative to e.g. editing with > longlines mode, but on the other hand, I don't understand why you > oppose DTWW support in Emacs. > > I oppose it as an alternative to longlines mode. > I don't necessarily oppose it as a way of continuing lines, > but I want to make sure it does not grow into an alternative > to longlines mode.
I never intended it to be an alternative to longlines mode. That is specifically why I have NOT made any attempt to make line-move and friends treat DTWW differently from normal continued lines. However, this is probably not the right time to add DTWW ... -- Kim F. Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cua.dk _______________________________________________ Emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
