> Maybe here it makes sense. But be super extra careful with t in
> such places: it considers all frames including frames on other displays.
> I didn't know that. Is that behavior special for `t'? Wouldn't it logically
> apply to `visible' and `0' also?
> If not:
> - Why is `t' an exception in this regard?
> - Is there no way to get the invisible-frames-too behavior
> of `t', without also the other-displays-too behavior?
I think it makes sense: frames that are invisible are similar to frames on
other displays in the sense that no amount of `display-buffer' (or
pop-to-buffer) will be sufficient to display them.
BTW, why do you worry so much about invisible frames? I've never actually
bumped into one.
Stefan
_______________________________________________
Emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
