Luc Teirlinck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill Wohler wrote:
>
> Also, why does the same code work in Emacs 21 and not in Emacs 22?
>
> I believe that I answered this in an earlier reply, but maybe you had
> not yet read that reply when you asked this.
Yes, that is correct. I liked your proposal to revert to Emacs 21
semantics. This would also fix the problem with the two broken MH-E
hooks which, as far as I can tell, shouldn't be broken (although I might
be confused about how require works ;-). (Who knows how many other hooks
are broken in the same way.)
If Gerd is listening, perhaps he can let us know why he added that
defvar:
revision 1.2
date: 2003/07/23 00:00:13; author: gm; state: Exp; lines: +5 -1
branches: 1.2.2;
(define-derived-mode): Mention hook in doc string. Defvar the derived
hook.
Maybe someone familiar with that code can take it out...
--
Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian!
If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.
_______________________________________________
Emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
