>> Looks like it works indeed, although it breaks my code because my code
>> relies on lexical-let which doesn't work correctly when the lambdas are
>> built at run time as is the case in your code.
>> So maybe I'll be better off with the current code. Hmm....
>> I can install my fix, or I can leave it out, but I can't do both at once.
> Too bad you're only a saint, eh?
>> The function as changed this way seems to be more capable and better,
>> which seems to suggest I should install my fix.
> Agreed.
>> Can you fix your code to work with the function's new capability?
> That's what I'm about to try,
I can indeed fix my code, but it then becomes really ugly, much uglier than
what I'm currently using.
Also looking at the existing uses of lazy-completion-table, I see that
bibtex.el relies on the current behavior.
Maybe it's better to leave the code as is.
If I want `arg' to be evaluated early, I can easily replace
(lazy-completion-table var fun arg)
with
(lazy-completion-table var `(lambda () (fun ',arg)))
[ which is what I'm currently using. ]
Stefan
_______________________________________________
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
