>> 1. It's not clear to me what is meant by "the event" and "its
>> binding". Aren't we talking here about a key sequence and
>> its binding in KEYMAP?
> The "event" is a "key" (not a key sequence: just one key).
> Its binding is either a command or another map (if the key is a prefix
> key).
> 1. I'm only saying that the doc is unclear to me. If you think it's clear,
> leave it as is.
Obviously, it's not clear to you, so it could use some improvement. I only
explained it, in the hope that we can then come up with a better wording,
once you understand it.
> My impression is that the doc generally speaks of, say, `C-k' as a "key
> sequence" not as an "event".
For most functions, we manipulate sequences of input events (i.e. key
sequences) rather than single input events.
> In particular, "a sequence of one event is always a key sequence".
Right, just like a list of one element is still a list.
map-keymap's function argument is called with an event as argument, not
a sequence of events.
> 2. I still have the question about whether FUNCTION is called for each
> binding or each key sequence.
I don't understand the question.
Stefan
_______________________________________________
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
