Dieter Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Please don't remove thumbs which is simpler than tumme, and IMHO works better > > Yes, I think in this case it makes sense to have a "lite" package - > especially for beginners - with few basic functionalities but > immediate gratification, so to say. And an advanced package, in this > case tumme, which I think has much more potential (to be better, after > I had some extended twiddling around).
Hi! I just noticed this thread. I am the one that created tumme.el last spring. It started at first as nothing more than a bunch of macros (almost), to see if I could merge image-manipulation with dired. The idea was to re-use the many powerful functions in dired as much as possible and my main goal was to use it for categorize/tag my photo collection, which started to get out of hand. I could not find any tool with advanced multi-tag and multi-file functionality. Hence tumme. It is still in its infancy as far as I am concerned, and needs polishing especially from a new user's perspective. I too find annoyances in it even though it works for my day-to-day image browsing/cleaning/categorizing, but I am sure all this can be sorted out. Maybe we should put up a page, TummeIssues, or TummeDiscussion, with stuff that people are unhappy about, etc? I am currently testing out how a Flickr-interface in Emacs would work out. If it turns out well, it should be easy to access it from tumme. _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
