On Wed, 10 May 2006 03:00:00 -0400 Glenn Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Berman wrote: > >> Friday, also in other months and years -- and failed to get the >> fontification problem with all of them except '(5 4 2006) and '(5 5 >> 2006)! With those two dates, and apparently those alone, I can >> replicate the fontification problem at will. I have no idea what's >> going on here, nor why you don't see what I do. > > I wasn't using those two particular dates. Now that I am, I can see > the problem too. Well done tracking *that* down! :) As to the cause, > umm... I'm relieved that you see it now; I was beginning to think there was something quirky in just my Emacs source tree. I don't have much else to suggest at the moment, except, as I mentioned in my OP, I'm quite sure I've seen this problem before, which means it's not, after all, just those two dates (at least I don't recall having looked at these specific future calendar dates). I don't have time right now to try and systematically test other dates, but I assume there must be a pattern somewhere (I did, however, test (5 5 2005) and (5 4 2005) and they didn't show the fontification problem). Steve Berman _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
