In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Leon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After many trials, I think I found another bug of emacs-unicode-2 > branch. I have the following settings in ~/.Xresources: > ,----[ ~/.Xresources ] > | Emacs.Fontset-0: -*-*-medium-r-*-*-16-*-*-*-*-*-fontset-unicode,\ > | ascii:-*-terminus-medium-r-*-*-16-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1,\ > | mule-unicode-2500-33ff:-gnu-unifont-medium-r-*-*-16-*-*-*-*-*-iso10646-1,\ > | mule-unicode-e000-ffff:-gnu-unifont-medium-r-*-*-16-*-*-*-*-*-iso10646-1,\ > | mule-unicode-0100-24ff:-gnu-unifont-medium-r-*-*-16-*-*-*-*-*-iso10646-1 > | Emacs.Font: fontset-unicode > `---- > In emacs-unicode-2, the font for ascii will be a font that matches > "-*-*-medium-r-*-*-16-*-*-*-*-*" instead of > "-*-terminus-medium-r-*-*-16-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1". > However, emacs 21.3 will correctly pick up the font matches > "-*-terminus-medium-r-*-*-16-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1". I can't reproduce that bug here (Debian+XFree86) with the latest emacs-unicode-2. With the above setting, Emacs starts up using a terminus font, and C-u C-x = on various characters tells that terminus fonts are being used. Have you tested it by starting Emacs with "-q"? What is the output of M-x describe-face RET default RET? --- Kenichi Handa [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
