Chong Yidong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> So how about adding an empty to-string as a way to preserve parity? > > That would mean that after doing a C-g, the next time you do M-% the > suggested replacement the will be "LAST_FROM -> ", i.e., replacing the > last from-string entered with the empty string, instead of the last > "good" pair of values as the bug reporter wanted. Maybe this is > acceptable behavior, I don't know.
I don't think that is acceptable ... after all, the user cancelled the previous M-%. What about using the FROM string as the TO string, so the cancelled M-% becomes a no-op. Does C-M-% suffer from the same problem? In that case, we could use "\&" as the TO string, making that a no-op as well. -- Kim F. Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cua.dk _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
