> From: Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 02:39:32 -0400 > > Would it make sense to change flyspell-auto-correct-word > to call flyspell-check-previous-highlighted-word, or to do some > of what it does? Since flyspell-auto-correct-word is the command > that is available on a tty.
Why overload flyspell-auto-correct-word with a meaning it wasn't supposed to bear? Why not bind flyspell-correct-word to some terminal key and use the techniques of flyspell-auto-correct-word or of ispell.el to show the possible corrections, instead? _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
