Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I wasn't really proposing a solution, just pointing to some places > that might fail to work as intended, because the code doesn't take the > possibility of signalling an error into account. > > Would you like to look at those places to see if there are real > problems? For each place, the question is: is there a real case where > the program would not be found, and where signalling a Lisp error > leads to bad results? > > I would expect that in most of these cases a Lisp error and its error > message would be an ok outcome. But you may find some where it is > desirable to arrange some other behavior.
I looked through all the uses of `call-process', and found that `ediff-test-utility' was the only place which I thought important enough to change now. _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
