Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected] >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kim F. Storm) >> Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 10:26:36 +0200 >> >> I agree that "redisplay-dont-pause" in its current form is not >> the best _user_ option for controlling this ... as it has the >> other purpose of forcing sit-for to perform a fully redisplay. >> >> But what is the alternative? > > The alternative should be a user option with clearly defined effects > of each of its possible values. redisplay-dont-pause doesn't possess > these qualities (to say nothing of its name). > >> BTW, there are no uses of redisplay-dont-pause in any Lisp code in >> CVS > > But xdisp.c binds it to t in one place.
Right -- I forgot about that one. But, a normal unwind_protect could handle that just as well. -- Kim F. Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cua.dk _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
