> Perhaps we should undo the recent change in sit-for.
> I don't remember the specific case for which we made it.
> If it was one specific caller that needed another facility,
> let's make (sit-for -1) do this, as someone else suggested.
Here is a way to do that.
It looks correct to me.
_______________________________________________
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
