> From: Aidan Kehoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 20:38:06 +0200 > Cc: [email protected], [email protected] > > > > Is it to trigger an "Invalid character" message, or is something else > > going on here? > > It doesn't actually trigger a message, it displays a character to be > interpreted as ``the character couldn't be interpreted.''
But in my testing, I do see an "Invalid character" message. Could you please show an example of using this new function to produce this special ``character that couldn't be interpreted''? > My feeling is that the syntax should be close in its behaviour to what the > coding systems do, and when the coding systems see a code point that is > valid but that they can't interpret, they trash the user's data. This function is not about coding systems, it's about character sets. Coding systems already replace unsupported characters with `?' (other applications behave like that as well), so perhaps we should use some more conventional character here. Does anyone have an opinion? _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
