> My comment is that the references to documentation (e.g., the coding > standards) are to the Web pages, not to Info manuals. I think the > file should at least mention the Info manuals as well, if not > exclusively.
I don't know if the user will have standards.texi as it's not part of the Emacs distribution so I think referencing the Web pages is useful. I'll mention the Info manuals too. > Also, when you talk about ChangeLog entries, I think you should point > to the relevant part of standards.texi. OK. > The method of marking changes in NEWS with "+++" and "---" should be > mentioned, IMO, as well as FOR-RELEASE (and the files in admin/ in > general). NEWS says: When you add a new item, please add it without either +++ or --- so we will look at it and add it to the manual. ^^^^^^^ i.e just add the item > Finally, there should be a reference to a couple of nodes in the ELisp > manual, such as "Tips" and "GNU Emacs Internals". For example, the > last lines of CONTRIBUTE mention just one of the tips in the "Tips" > node. Actually I've mentioned "GNU Emacs Internals" but I'll add "Tips". -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
