Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> So to me it makes no sense for CONTRIBUTE to _describe_ those files. > > Yes, it does: users will see those files described, and will then know > to look for them when/if they start using the CVS code.
Since the files in admin/ are only marginally useful for the average contributor, and the _are_ described in admin/README (modulo a few missing items), I still don't see a need to also describe them in CONTRIBUTE. IMHO, CONTRIBUTE should only describe things which are included in the source tarball -- with the exception of INSTALL.CVS (and perhaps admin/README if we put something more useful into it). >> But it do make sense to _mention_ that after downloading the source >> package from CVS, the first file to read should be INSTALL.CVS. > > Yes, that's a good idea. I have added that. > > We could have README.CVS I like that idea. If we make it, we should remove admin/README (and place that information into README.CVS). -- Kim F. Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cua.dk _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
