> Great! Someone fixed my code before I even had the time to look at > this myself! :) > > What do others think, is it safe to fix this in Emacs CVS now? Also, > is the two variants equal on all platforms?
I've already done this as Richard asked me to DTRT. I've also used with-current-buffer where needed, and made the code fit on 80 columns. The pretest has not started yet and it makes sense to fix all reported bugs anyway. I don't use Tumme so it would be good if you can test my changes. > I am a bit skeptical about > the "-c" switch. What problem can you see? If you see a better fix then you should install it. > A better way, IMHO, would be if there was a way to supress the output > from `shell-command' when it the command does not generate any output. AFAIK shell-command is is for interactive use: hence the message in minibuffer. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
