Richard Stallman schrieb:
Thanks for starting to explore this issue.
Because it only finds `defun' calls, it fails to find other constructs
that define functions or macros. Also, it would get rather confused
when dealing with top-level forms that don't define functions at all:
it just skips them.
Correct my answer in this point. Here a hopefully better one:
What was sent indeed was a `beginning-of-defun' in his
true understanding (as I conceive that) - nothing more.
After that we could have a function dealing with a
group of function-forms in Emacs Lisp while extending
the reg-rexp appropriate, i.e. a `beginning-of-function'.
__
Andreas Roehler
_______________________________________________
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
