> From: Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [email protected] > Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 13:48:39 +0200 > > One additional thought regarding CHECK_NUMER: x_get_arg returning 0 > for an invalid value if RES_TYPE_NUMBER is used, might just be an > implementation detail. At least I don't see that behavior documented > anywhere. That means CHECK_NUMBER could be useful once the > implementation of x_get_arg changes. But as this seems unlikely, the > question of using it or not using it is probably not very important.
If this ever happens, we will get bug reports soon enough! _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
